Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976413›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Tree balance in phylogenetic models.

Sophie J Kersting, Kristina Wicke, Mareike Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Speciation completion rates have limited impact on macroevolutionary diversification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Tree balance in phylogenetic models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Shape parameters of evolutionary trees in theoretical computer science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Mathematically tractable models of random phylogenetic networks: an overview of some recent developments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Reading Yule in light of the history and present of macroevolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. "A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie J KerstingInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17487, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-9246
Kristina WickeDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4275-5546
Mareike FischerInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17487, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9429-0859

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tree shape statistics, particularly measures of tree (im)balance, play an important role in the analysis of the shape of phylogenetic trees. With applications ranging from testing evolutionary models to studying the impact of fertility inheritance and selection, or tumour development and language evolution, the assessment of measures of tree balance is important. Currently, a multitude of at least 30 (im)balance indices can be found in the literature, alongside numerous other tree shape statistics. This diversity prompts essential questions: how can we assist researchers in choosing only a small number of indices to mitigate the challenges of multiple testing? Is there a preeminent balance index tailored to specific tasks? This research expands previous studies on the examination of index power, encompassing almost all established indices and a broader array of alternative models, such as a variety of trait-based models. Our investigation reveals distinct groups of balance indices better suited for different tree models, suggesting that decisions on balance index selection can be enhanced with prior knowledge. Furthermore, we present the R software package poweRbal which allows the inclusion of new indices and models, thus facilitating future research on the power of tree shape statistics.This article is part of the theme issue '"A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticPhylogenymacroevolutionphylogenetic modelstree balanceYule model

Identifiers

PMID39976413
PMCPMC11867160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.