ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Speciation completion rates have limited impact on macroevolutionary diversification.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- No Consistent Effect of Migration on Speciation Rates in Two Avian Superfamilies: A Check on the Robustness of Trait-Dependent Diversification Methods.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Negative global-scale association between genetic diversity and speciation rates in mammals.Nature communications · 2025Article
- "A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Speciation completion rates have limited impact on macroevolutionary diversification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard birth-death (BD) processes used in macroevolutionary studies assume instantaneous speciation, an unrealistic premise that limits the interpretation of speciation and extinction rates. The protracted birth-death (PBD) model instead assumes that speciation involves two steps: initiation and completion. In order to understand their respective influence on macroevolutionary speciation rates, we compute a standard time-varying BD scenario that is 'equivalent' to the PBD model in terms of speciation and extinction probabilities. First, we find a sharp decline in the equivalent birth rate near the present, indicating that rates estimated at the tips of phylogenies may not accurately reflect the underlying speciation process. Second, the completion rate controls the timing of the decay rather than the asymptotic equivalent rates. The equivalent birth rate in the past scales with the speciation initiation rate, with a scaling factor depending mostly on the population extinction rate. Our results suggest that the rates of population formation and extinction may often play a larger role than the speed of accumulation of reproductive isolation in modulating speciation rates. Our study establishes a theoretical framework for understanding how microevolutionary processes combine to explain the diversification of species on macroevolutionary time scales.This article is part of the theme issue '"A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.