Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976404›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Birth and death processes in phylogenetics and population genetics.

Simon Tavaré

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Ages, sizes and (trees within) trees of taxa and of urns, from Yule to today.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon TavaréIrving Institute for Cancer Dynamics, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3716-4952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on linear birth-and-death processes (LBDPs), describing the basic properties of the population-size process and the underlying ancestral trees that record how the evolving species (or individuals or cells) are related. The first section describes the Yule, or linear birth, process setting. Analogous results for the birth-and-death process (BDP) are given. The stochastic structure of the reconstructed tree obtained by pruning branches that do not survive to the present time is detailed. In §2, the BDP with immigration is described. Immigration is a mechanism to introduce new types into a population evolving through time. For the Yule process, marked Poisson process arguments are used to illustrate properties of the sample variance of the number of families observed in two consecutive time intervals. In the final section, we describe a recent method for approximate Bayesian computation using random forests, and illustrate it with an example of inference from DNA sequence data about the split rate and mutation rate in a birth-and-death model for the evolution of a cell population.This article is part of the theme issue '"A mathematical theory of evolution": phylogenetic models dating back 100 years'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationModels, GeneticPhylogenyBayes Theoremapproximate Bayesian computationcoalescentdistributional random forestsmarked Poisson processesphylogenetic treesstatistical inferenceYule process

Identifiers

PMID39976404
PMCPMC11867164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.