ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Learning genotype-phenotype associations from gaps in multi-species sequence alignments.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic variation is fundamental to biology. Here we introduce GAP, a novel machine learning framework for predicting binary phenotypes from gaps in multi-species sequence alignments. GAP employs a neural network to predict the presence or absence of phenotypes solely from alignment gaps, contrasting with existing tools that require additional and often inaccessible input data. GAP can be applied to three distinct problems: predicting phenotypes in species from known associated genomic regions, pinpointing positions within such regions that are important for predicting phenotypes, and extracting sets of candidate regions associated with phenotypes. We showcase the utility of GAP by exploiting the well-known association between the L-gulonolactone oxidase (Gulo) gene and vitamin C synthesis, demonstrating its perfect prediction accuracy in 34 vertebrates. This exceptional performance also applies more generally, with GAP achieving high accuracy and power on a large simulated dataset. Moreover, predictions of vitamin C synthesis in species with unknown status mirror their phylogenetic relationships, and positions with high predictive importance are consistent with those identified by previous studies. Last, a genome-wide application of GAP identifies many additional genes that may be associated with vitamin C synthesis, and analysis of these candidates uncovers functional enrichment for immunity, a widely recognized role of vitamin C. Hence, GAP represents a simple yet useful tool for predicting genotype-phenotype associations and addressing diverse evolutionary questions from data available in a broad range of study systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.