Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976277›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2025

A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures-Part 1: Implant Materials and Surgical Techniques.

Rachel Duhan Wåhlberg, Victoria Franke Stenport, Ann Wennerberg, Lars Hjalmarsson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07149987 (Assessing the Role of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides in Enhancing Dental Implant Placement Precision and Patient Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07149987 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Role of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides in Enhancing Dental Implant Placement Precision and Patient Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MosulRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsDental Implant, Dental Implant Failure, Peri Implantitis, Cone Beam Computed TomographyArmsAll implant placements were performed exclusively in the maxillary region (upper jaw) to ensure a controlled comparison within the same anatomical area
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Duhan WåhlbergDepartment of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2898-7595
Victoria Franke StenportDepartment of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5911-3665
Ann WennerbergDepartment of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-1133
Lars HjalmarssonDepartment of Prosthodontics/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

Funding

Center for Clinical Research in SörmlandPublic Dental Service Region SörmlandPublic Dental Service Region Västra GötalandThe Swedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental implant materials, designs as well as general concepts for surgical techniques have evolved during the last decades. It has been validated that primary stability followed by bone apposition around implants is crucial for implant survival as most implant failures occur during the first year. However, new implant materials and different micro and macro designs have improved implant survival in more challenging clinical conditions. Therefore, clinical research with large patient groups is needed to investigate the effects of different implant designs and surgical protocols with the aim to improve early implant outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical use of dental implant materials, designs, and surgical techniques related to early implant complications and failures. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients who had received implant surgery in 2007 and 2017 at three specialist centers in Sweden were identified using charge codes. Data were retrieved from a dental record system as well as from digital and analog registries on implant surgeries. Information on anamnestic data, bone status, implant materials and designs, surgery techniques, and early implant failures and complications during the first year was compiled and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for comparison of the time cohorts. The data were statistically analyzed with a multivariable logistic regression model with a significance level of p < 0.05 using early implant failures and complications as the dependent variables.

resultsFor 2007, 799 patients with 2473 implants were identified. For 2017, 1076 patients with 2287 implants were identified. However, 74 (3.7%) patients were excluded, mainly due to lack of data. Differences were observed when comparing the two cohorts. In 2017, fewer preoperative antibiotics were prescribed, more incidences of exposed implant threads were reported, more non-submerged implant surgeries were performed, shorter implant lengths were used, more implants were placed in augmented bone, and tapered implants with a variable design were used. Implants of commercially pure titanium (CP Ti) Grades 1-4 with moderately and minimally rough surfaces were used in 2007, whereas CP Ti Grade 4 and alloy titanium zirconium (TiZr) with moderately rough surfaces were used in 2017. Significantly higher number of implant failures were reported in 2017 at the implant level: 56 (2.4%) in 2017 compared to 26 (1.1%) in 2007. Eleven variables were shown to increase the risk of failure including exposed implant threads OR 3.56 (1.60, 7.91) p = 0.0018 and increased number of implants per patients 1.26 (1.14, 1.39) p < 0.001 analyzed at the patient level. Nine variables were shown to increase the risk of early implant complications, including exposed implant threads OR 4.52 (2.60, 7.87) p < 0.001, sinus membrane perforations OR 8.14 (2.46, 26.93) p < 0.001, and no prescription of preoperative antibiotics OR 4.52 (2.60, 7.87) p < 0.001 analyzed at the patient level.

conclusionsThis study reports on changes in implant materials, designs, and surgical techniques between 2007 and 2017. Significantly higher numbers of implant failures and complications were reported in 2017. Factors related to early implant complications and failures were identified.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental MaterialsDental Prosthesis DesignDental Restoration FailureAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenDental ImplantsDental Materialsearly implant complicationsearly implant failuresimplant designimplant materialsmulticenter studysurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID39976277
PMCPMC11840881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.