Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976243›Full record

ArticleCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Cancer statistics for African American and Black people, 2025.

Anatu H Saka, Angela N Giaquinto, Lauren E McCullough, Katherine Y Tossas, Jessica Star, Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca L Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anatu H SakaCancer Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Angela N GiaquintoCancer Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2548-9693
Lauren E McCulloughDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6723-9540
Katherine Y TossasDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6872-2294
Jessica StarRisk Factors and Screening Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-9609
Ahmedin JemalSurveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rebecca L SiegelCancer Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5247-8522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African American and other Black individuals (referred to as Black people in this article) have a disproportionate cancer burden, including the lowest survival of any racial or ethnic group for most cancers. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society estimates the number of new cancer cases and deaths for Black people in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence (herein through 2021), mortality (through 2022), survival, screening, and risk factors using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2025, there will be approximately 248,470 new cancer cases and 73,240 cancer deaths among Black people in the United States. Black men have experienced the largest relative decline in cancer mortality from 1991 to 2022 overall (49%) and in almost every 10-year age group, by as much as 65%-67% in the group aged 40-59 years. This progress largely reflects historical reductions in smoking initiation among Black teens, advances in treatment, and earlier detections for some cancers. Nevertheless, during the most recent 5 years, Black men had 16% higher mortality than White men despite just 4% higher incidence, and Black women had 10% higher mortality than White women despite 9% lower incidence. Larger inequalities for mortality than for incidence reflect two-fold higher death rates for prostate, uterine corpus, and stomach cancers and for myeloma, and 40%-50% higher rates for colorectal, breast, cervical, and liver cancers. The causes of ongoing disparities are multifactorial, but largely stem from inequalities in the social determinants of health that trace back to structural racism. Increasing diversity in clinical trials, enhancing provider education, and implementing financial incentives to ensure equitable care across the cancer care continuum would help close these gaps.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocial Determinants of HealthSystemic RacismUnited StatesWhiteAfrican AmericansBlack peoplecancer statisticsincidencemortality

Identifiers

PMID39976243
PMCPMC11929131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.