ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Evaluating the pharmacokinetics and safety of blonanserin tablets and Lonasen
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) in Bone Repair and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Scoping Review of Skeletal Regeneration, Joint and Tendon Involvement, and CGRP-Targeted Therapies.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Formononetin attenuates neuroinflammation and confers neuroprotection in a pentylenetetrazol-induced kindling model of epilepsy in mice.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of generic and original blonanserin tablets under fasting and postprandial conditions, and the bioequivalence of two formulations to obtain sufficient evidence for abbreviated new drug application. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence, self-crossover bioequivalence study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of the test and reference blonanserin tablets under fasting and postprandial conditions. Eligible healthy individuals received a single 4-mg dose of either the test or reference blonanserin tablet, followed by a wash out period of 14 days. Serial blood samples were collected for up to 72 h after administration during each period, and the plasma concentrations of blonanserin were determined using a validated method. The non-compartmental method was used to calculate the primary pharmacokinetic parameters, and the geometric mean ratios for the PK parameters of the test drug to those of the reference drug, along with the corresponding 90% confidence intervals, were obtained for bioequivalence analysis. Throughout the study, a safety evaluation was conducted. Results: Under both fasting and postprandial conditions, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug were found to be similar to those of the reference drug. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 97.79%-118.28% for peak concentration (C Conclusion: The bioequivalence of blonanserin tablets, both test and reference, was confirmed in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions, meeting the predetermined regulatory criteria for both formulations. Both formulations were found to be safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20230703.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.