Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Differentiation between glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases using perfusion and amide proton transfer weighted MRI.

Malte Knutsson, Tim Salomonsson, Faris Durmo, Emelie Ryd Johansson, Anina Seidemo, Jimmy Lätt, Anna Rydelius, Sara Kinhult, Elisabet Englund, Johan Bengzon and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Malte KnutssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tim SalomonssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Faris DurmoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Emelie Ryd JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anina SeidemoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jimmy LättDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anna RydeliusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sara KinhultDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabet EnglundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan BengzonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Peter C M van ZijlF.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Linda KnutssonF.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Pia C SundgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Early diagnostic separation between glioblastoma (GBM) and solitary metastases (MET) is important for patient management but remains challenging when based on imaging only. The objective of this study was to assess whether amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) MRI alone or combined with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI parameters, including cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and leakage parameter (K2) measurements, can differentiate GBM from MET. Methods: APTw MRI and DSC-MRI were performed on 18 patients diagnosed with GBM ( Results: When comparing GBM to MET, nAPT Conclusion: When assessed in Gd-enhanced tumor areas, nAPTw MRI signal intensity alone or combined with DSC-MRI parameters, was an excellent predictor for differentiating GBM and MET. However, the small cohort warrants future studies.

Indexed as

amide proton transfer-weighted imagingCESTdynamic susceptibility contrast MRIgliomametastases

Identifiers

PMID39975970
PMCPMC11836003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.