ArticleResearch square2025
Accurate Prediction of Protein Complex Stoichiometry by Integrating AlphaFold3 and Template Information.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structure prediction methods require stoichiometry information (i.e., subunit counts) to predict the quaternary structure of protein complexes. However, this information is often unavailable, making stoichiometry prediction crucial for complexes with unknown stoichiometry. Despite its importance, few computational methods address this challenge. In this study, we present an approach that integrates AlphaFold3 structure predictions with homologous template data to predict stoichiometry. The method generates candidate stoichiometries, builds structural models for them using AlphaFold3, ranks them based on AlphaFold3 scores, and further refine predictions with template-based information when available. In the 16th community-wide Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP16), our method achieved 71.4% top-1 accuracy and 92.9% top-3 accuracy, outperforming other predictors in terms of the overall performance. This demonstrates the complementary strengths of AlphaFold3- and template-based predictions and highlights its applicability for uncharacterized protein complexes lacking stoichiometry data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.