Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975897›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Feedback control over plasma drug concentrations achieves rapid and accurate control over solid-tissue drug concentrations.

Nicole Emmons, Zeki Duman, Murat Erdal, Tod Kippin, Joao Hespanha, Kevin Plaxco

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole EmmonsUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.
Zeki DumanUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.
Murat ErdalUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.
Tod KippinUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.
Joao HespanhaUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.
Kevin PlaxcoUniversity of California, Santa Barbara.

Funding

Modular, in-situ probes of brain chemistryR01DA051100 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI KIPPIN, TOD EDWARD, PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2020 to 2023
$2.1M
Feedback controlled, ultra-high-precision drug deliveryR01AI145206 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145206NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical aptamer-based (EAB) sensors enable the continuous, real-time monitoring of drugs and biomarkers in situ in the blood, brain, and peripheral tissues of live subjects. The real-time concentration information produced by these sensors provides unique opportunities to perform closed-loop, feedback-controlled drug delivery, by which the plasma concentration of a drug can be held constant or made to follow a specific, time-varying profile. Motivated by the observation that the site of action of many drugs is the solid tissues and not the blood, here we experimentally confirm that maintaining constant plasma drug concentrations also produces constant concentrations in the interstitial fluid (ISF). Using an intravenous EAB sensor we performed feedback control over the concentration of doxorubicin, an anthracycline chemotherapeutic, in the plasma of live rats. Using a second sensor placed in the subcutaneous space, we find drug concentrations in the ISF rapidly (30-60 min) match and then accurately (RMS deviation of 8-21%) remain at the feedback-controlled plasma concentration, validating the use of feedback-controlled plasma drug concentrations to control drug concentrations in the solid tissues that are the site of drug action. We expanded to pairs of sensors in the ISF, the outputs of the individual sensors track one another with good precision (

Identifiers

PMID39975897
PMCPMC11838736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.