ArticleResearch square2025
Overdose risk environment for people who use drugs in New Jersey: Imagining possible points of intervention for harm reduction practitioners.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Risk Environment Framework is widely utilized theoretical framework for understanding the landscape of harm for people who use drugs (PWUD). This study sought to understand factors contributing to risk of overdose for PWUD in New Jersey. Understanding these factors can lead to improved policy interventions, programmatic targets, and a shared understanding that overdose risk is impacted by larger societal forces influencing PWUD. Methods: Using a community based participatory design model, this study conducted 30 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with PWUD and naloxone distributors in New Brunswick and Newark, New Jersey from February to November of 2022. Thematic analysis was performed using a collaborative analytical approach. Results: Risk factors for overdose fell into all four categories of Rhodes's Risk Environment Framework - physical, social, economic, and policy. Many factors overlapped in multiple categories, and most factors had elements existing at both the macro and micro levels. Conclusions: Interventions supporting PWUD should see overdose risk as an environmental, structural consideration, and be constructed to address comprehensive risks, rather than directing themselves exclusively at the individual level. Factors contributing to risk at the macro level included systemic and institutional concerns and stigma toward PWUD. At the micro level, mental health, substance use behaviors, treatment and recovery, and trauma were cited as potential risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.