ArticleHeliyon2025
A novel Pringle maneuver instrument for laparoscopic hepatectomy.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Pringle maneuver is a classic and commonly used technique in hepatectomy for bleeding control. However, it is not convenient to perform Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic hepatectomy. This study aimed to investigate the value of a novel blocking forceps designed by our center for the Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods: Data of patients with liver tumors who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients who underwent an intraoperative Pringle maneuver were selected. Cases using the new blocking forceps comprised the new blocking forceps group (NBF group), while cases using the traditional method of binding the hepatoduodenal ligament comprised the traditional group (TRA group). The baseline and perioperative data of the two patient groups were compared and analyzed. Results: A total of 253 cases were included in the analysis, including 169 in the TRA group and 84 in the NBF group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative examinations and other indicators. The NBF group had a significantly lower number of blocks, total blocking time, intraoperative bleeding, and transfusion ratio than the TRA group. Conclusion: Our self-designed blocking forceps can safely and effectively complete the Pringle maneuver and are convenient to operate, which is conducive to the successful completion of the operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.