ArticleHeliyon2025
Continuous monitoring of temporal skills during long-term in-home training by cochlear implant users.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear implants improve auditory function in individuals with severe hearing loss, yet cochlear implant users often struggle with tasks such as identifying speaker characteristics and musical elements. While music therapy shows promise in addressing these deficits, standardized rehabilitation protocols, especially those focusing on music-based sound recognition, remain underdeveloped. This study evaluates the efficacy of EARPLANTED, a free platform developed at the Faculty of Physics, University of Bialystok, which includes a melodic contour identification test accessible on personal computers and mobile devices. Fifty cochlear implant users and 45 normally hearing volunteers participated in repeated testing sessions. Logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to analyse temporal changes in musical perception, offering insights into score distributions and progression over time. Results revealed significant differences in scores, with volunteers outperforming cochlear implant users. However, many volunteers also found the test challenging, highlighting its complexity. Temporal analysis showed that extended use of the platform generally led to improved scores among cochlear implant users. The findings underscore the need for cautious interpretation of melodic contour identification test results, given the difficulty experienced by both cochlear implant users and normally hearing individuals. The platform's utility, particularly for unilateral users, suggests its potential role in auditory rehabilitation. This study highlights the benefits of continuous monitoring and remote data collection via smartphones, providing clinicians and researchers with a practical tool for long-term rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.