ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Camrelizumab combined with neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S1 as induction therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: a real-world single-center cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiation in ESCC: real-world data.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Despite promising results from randomized trials, there is a need for real-world evidence to understand the broader applicability and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant treatments in diverse patient populations with ESCC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC in a real-world setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 83 patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable ESCC who received neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S1 chemotherapy at Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University from March 2020 to May 2023. Inclusion criteria were based on clinical stage, histological confirmation, and patient tolerance. Baseline clinical characteristics were assessed using standard diagnostic tools. Treatment involved three cycles of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy, with efficacy and safety evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Tumor downstaging, survival outcomes, and safety were assessed. Results: The median age of patients was 61 years (range, 46-75 years), and tumors were predominantly located in the middle (n=49, 59.04%) and lower (n=23, 27.71%) regions of the esophagus. Most patients were diagnosed at stages III-IV (55.42% and 38.55%, respectively), and all of the patients completed neoadjuvant treatment. Additionally, 24 (28.92%) patients achieved complete response (CR), 40 (48.19%) patients achieved partial response (PR), and 9 (10.84%) patients achieved stable disease (SD). The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.11% (64/83), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 87.95% (73/83). Of the 14 patients who underwent surgery, the R0 resection rate was 100%, and 28.57% (4/14) achieved pathological CR (pCR). The median follow-up time was 31.0 months, and the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 56.9%. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 6.02% (5/83). No deaths occurred. Conclusions: While our real-world data suggest potential benefits of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC, the absence of a control group limits the generalizability of these findings. Further randomized studies are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.