ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025
Occult hepatitis B virus infection: risk for a blood supply, but how about individuals' health?
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occult hepatitis B virus infection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Article
- Blood donor hepatitis B data: An under-recognized surveillance resource in Canada.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
- Implications of occult hepatitis B infection for blood donor management: a five-year evaluation from Western Saudi Arabia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Hidden Reservoir: High Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B and Associated Surface Gene Mutations in a Healthy Vietnamese Adult Cohort.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Dual defects in HBsAg antigenicity and secretion caused by the C138R mutation in the S gene trigger occult hepatitis B virus infection.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of effective blood donation screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) anti-core antibodies with highly sensitive molecular HBV DNA detection in low-endemic countries like the United Kingdom has improved blood safety. However, the linkage to care and management for blood donors with occult HBV infection (OBI) is a complex dilemma involving virological, clinical, methodological, and social issues. Limited evidence suggests that OBI may accelerate the progression of liver disease and cancer. The need for a specialist referral for donors identified with OBI carries mixed opinions from blood establishments, hepatologists, and public health. Following extensive multidisciplinary discussions, experts agree upon a need for clear messaging for donors and to consider the oncogenic implications of OBI. Proposals for future studies are identified, and the applicability of the recommendations in low-resource, high-endemic regions is considered, as well as the inclusion of OBI in global hepatitis elimination targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.