Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975688›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025

Real-World Evaluation of an EHR-Enabled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test.

Nathaniel Gaeckle, Edward Corazalla, Judy S Kelloway, Joshua N Liberman, Jonathan David Darer, Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski, Rosirene Paczkowski, Purva Parab, Charles Ruetsch

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nathaniel GaeckleDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Edward CorazallaPulmonary Function Test Laboratory, M Health Fairview, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Judy S KellowayUS Medical Affairs, GSK, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.
Joshua N LibermanHealth Analytics LLC, Clarksville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4907-812X
Jonathan David DarerHealth Analytics LLC, Clarksville, MD, USA.
Kristin Kahle-WrobleskiUS Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rosirene PaczkowskiUS Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Purva ParabHealth Analytics LLC, Clarksville, MD, USA.
Charles RuetschHealth Analytics LLC, Clarksville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0879-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) measures COPD's impact on well-being and daily activities and is a recommended assessment by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Our research objective was to describe a real-world CAT implementation, including the association of CAT scores with subsequent treatment and clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: A retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study was conducted among adults with COPD who received care from M Health Fairview, a US healthcare delivery system. Eligible patients had an initial electronic health record (EHR) enabled CAT administration (index) between 8/2017 and 12/2021. Patients were grouped by score (<10 [low impact]; 11-20 [moderate]; and 21-40 [high]). Demographics, comorbidities, provider specialty, and exacerbation history were derived from EHR data in the 12 months preceding index. Results: Of 11,194 eligible individuals, 821 (7.3%) were administered CAT (cases). Compared to individuals with no documented CAT scores (comparators), cases were older (66.7 vs 63.9 years; Conclusion: In a real-world practice setting, few patients with COPD received a CAT, although pulmonologists demonstrated repeated use. Higher CAT scores were associated with COPD medication regimen intensification and exacerbations. Further investigation on how to incorporate the CAT into routine care and optimize its impact on medical decision making and evaluation is warranted.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexClinical Relevance, MeSHCOPD Assessment TestPatient Reported Outcome Measures, MeSHPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, MeSH

Identifiers

PMID39975688
PMCPMC11835772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.