SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the clinical outcomes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for outcomes in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were conducted to search literature up to May 2024 and cohort and case-control studies were included. The primary outcomes were mortality and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess result stability, reliability, and subgroup analyses to identify sources of heterogeneity using Review Manager 5.4.1. Egger's tests were performed with Stata 15.1, and funnel plots were generated using Review Manager 5.4.1. Microsoft Excel was used for the initial data summarization. Results: Fourteen studies involving 30,752 AIDS patients were included. The pooled data showed higher NLR significantly associated with increased mortality (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.43-2.41, Conclusion: NLR is a key prognostic biomarker for predicting mortality and progression-free survival (PFS) in AIDS patients. Incorporating NLR into predictive models may improve prognostic assessments and guide clinical decision-making. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024532918: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.