Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975666›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Two new doping-free manufacturing processes for bread-derived carbon electrodes with control over micro- and macro-topological surface features.

David Bujdos, Zachary Kuzel, Adam Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David BujdosDepartment of Engineering, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 15650, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5201-9208
Zachary KuzelDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Adam WoodDepartment of Engineering, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 15650, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrolyzed carbon electrodes (PCEs) can provide sustainable alternatives in electric devices, but it is difficult to control their surface geometries during their semi-destructive fabrication procedure. Impressive contributions have been made to the field of PCE fabrication in terms of the nanoscale, functionalization, and separation applications; however, further progress towards an emphasis on a sustainable life cycle is the next step forward. Here, we propose two new methodologies for creating sustainable PCEs: stamping, where a user-designed, 3D printed electrode precursor (EP) imparts a shape on an organic material, and reconstitution, where the same EP acts as a mould as a mixture of agitated organic material and water dries to leave behind a rigid shape. Both methods allow for the reuse of the EP and the upcycling of biologically derived waste products as a pyrolytic input, and they do not require chemical modification. A comparison of the two methodologies is discussed as surface features of PCEs scale by a factor of 0.78 during the reconstitution process and by a factor of 0.68 during the stamping process. These PCEs maintain defined structures on the micro-scale and demonstrate previously unachievable resolution to the naked eye prior to these two novel pathways.

Indexed as

carbon electrodeelectrode precursorpyrolysisreconstitutingstamping

Identifiers

PMID39975666
PMCPMC11835498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.