Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975663›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

If you blink at me, I'll blink back. Domestic dogs' feedback to conspecific visual cues.

Chiara Canori, Tiziano Travain, Giulia Pedretti, Rachele Fontani, Paola Valsecchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara CanoriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Via Gramsci 14, University of Parma, Parma 43126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-9328
Tiziano TravainDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, University of Parma, Parma 43124, Italy.
Giulia PedrettiDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, University of Parma, Parma 43124, Italy.
Rachele FontaniDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, University of Parma, Parma 43124, Italy.
Paola ValsecchiDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, University of Parma, Parma 43124, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blinking, along with other facial expressions, has been suggested to play a role in dogs' intra- and interspecific communication, however the feedback this signal elicits from the audience is still poorly studied. In this study, we investigated the behavioural and physiological responses of 54 domestic dogs to videos of conspecifics performing blink. Based on existing literature, we hypothesized that dogs would show a higher rate of blinking when exposed to blink than to another facial expression (nose lick) and to an attentive still-looking face (control). Results showed that dogs blinked more during the blink video compared to the nose lick (NL) video, suggesting a mimicry phenomenon and implying a possible role of blinking in dogs' communication. Cardiac analyses showed increased heart rate variability values during the video sessions independently to the type of facial signal projected, suggesting that the stimuli were not perceived as stressful. The present results open the door to future investigation of blink synchronization, as this aspect was not directly addressed in the present study. Future research should also explore the effects of eye blink and NL in modulating intraspecific social interactions.

Indexed as

appeasement behavioursblinkdomestic dogHRVnose lickvisual communication

Identifiers

PMID39975663
PMCPMC11836432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.