ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
If you blink at me, I'll blink back. Domestic dogs' feedback to conspecific visual cues.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can you read my poker-face? Adapting the still-face paradigm to explore dog's interspecific communication.Animal cognition · 2026Article
- If you blink at me, I'll blink back. Domestic dogs' feedback to conspecific visual cues.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blinking, along with other facial expressions, has been suggested to play a role in dogs' intra- and interspecific communication, however the feedback this signal elicits from the audience is still poorly studied. In this study, we investigated the behavioural and physiological responses of 54 domestic dogs to videos of conspecifics performing blink. Based on existing literature, we hypothesized that dogs would show a higher rate of blinking when exposed to blink than to another facial expression (nose lick) and to an attentive still-looking face (control). Results showed that dogs blinked more during the blink video compared to the nose lick (NL) video, suggesting a mimicry phenomenon and implying a possible role of blinking in dogs' communication. Cardiac analyses showed increased heart rate variability values during the video sessions independently to the type of facial signal projected, suggesting that the stimuli were not perceived as stressful. The present results open the door to future investigation of blink synchronization, as this aspect was not directly addressed in the present study. Future research should also explore the effects of eye blink and NL in modulating intraspecific social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.