ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
The predictive outfielder: a critical test across gravities.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interception of visible and occluded ballistic trajectories: differential contributions by areas MT/V5, V6, V6A and the vestibular premotor cortex evaluated by TMS.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Article
- The predictive outfielder: a critical test across gravities.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intercepting moving targets is a widespread challenge across many species. In humans, heuristics that use optic variables have excelled in guiding interception, relying on a closed-loop system to couple optic variables directly with direction of locomotion. This contrasts with models that explicitly recover final positions from initial trajectory conditions. However, comparing these different approaches using empirical data is challenging, as they often predict similar locomotion trajectories. We present a model based on optic variables that continuously updates predictions on the landing position in the three-dimensional scene and remaining flight time based on the outfielder's real-time movements. A distinct feature is the model's adaptability to different gravitational accelerations, making its predictions inherently tailored to specific environments. By actively integrating gravity, our model produces trajectory predictions that can be validated against actual paths. To compare our model with previous ones, we conducted experiments within virtual reality, strategically varying simulated gravity and physical size. The variation in gravity resulted in qualitatively distinct predictions between heuristics based solely on optic variables and our model, which incorporates gravity. The empirical trajectories, kinematic patterns and timing responses aligned well with our model's predictions, emphasizing the importance of including environmental constants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.