Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975562›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Meat analogues: The relationship between mechanical anisotropy, macrostructure, and microstructure.

Miek Schlangen, Iris van der Doef, Atze Jan van der Goot, Mathias P Clausen, Thomas E Kodger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miek SchlangenLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Iris van der DoefLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Atze Jan van der GootLaboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Mathias P ClausenSDU Biotechnology, Department of Green Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Denmark.
Thomas E KodgerPhysical Chemistry and Soft Matter, Agrotechnology & Food Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, WK 6700, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Texture of meat analogues is crucial for consumer acceptance, yet it remains poorly defined, but it known that it is influenced by mechanical properties and structure at different length scales. This study describes the relationships between macrostructure, microstructure, and mechanical anisotropy in meat analogues. Two distinct meat analogue product sets are produced with shear cell technology varying in formulations and processing conditions to obtain a wide range of product structures: one based on mung bean protein-rich fractions and the other based on combinations of soy protein isolate and pectin. Mechanical properties are assessed using tensile testing, microstructure is studied using X-ray tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy, and macrostructure is quantified using a computer vision algorithm based on segmentation and shape features. Both correlation analyses on the response parameters and parameter variance are studied to distinguish the product sets. Strong correlations are found between anisotropy-related parameters, such as fibre score in macrostructure, air anisotropy in microstructure, and the toughness anisotropy index from mechanical properties. Some correlations are found to be product-set independent, such as air bubble anisotropy and fibre score, indicating universal relationships within this study, while other correlations are product-set dependent, such as between fibre score and the anisotropy index of the Young's Modulus in the mung bean fine fraction product set. The relationship between microstructural air bubbles and macrostructure and mechanical properties is apparent in all correlation analyses. Last, univariate feature selection provided insight into which parameters are most important for selected target features.

Indexed as

Air bubblesAnisotropyMeat analoguesMechanical propertiesMicrostructureStructure

Identifiers

PMID39975562
PMCPMC11836517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.