Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975500›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2025

A scoping review of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.

John W Cyrus, Laura Zeigen, Molly Knapp, Amy E Blevins, Brandon Patterson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John W Cyruscyrusjw@vcu.edu, Research and Education Librarian, Health Sciences Library, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-5151,
Laura Zeigenzeigenl@ohsu.edu, Health Sciences Education and Research Librarian, Oregon Health & Science University Library, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-0565
Molly Knappmolly.knapp@utah.edu, Training Development Manager, Network of the National Library of Medicine National Training Office, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-8747
Amy E Blevinsaeblevin@iu.edu, Associate Director for Public Services, Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-2683
Brandon Pattersonb.patterson@utah.edu, Technology Engagement Librarian, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-4731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A scoping review was undertaken to understand the extent of literature on librarian involvement in competency-based medical education (CBME). Methods: We followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. A search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted on December 31, 2022, in Medline, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL Complete, SCOPUS, LISS, LLIS, and LISTA. Studies were included if they described librarian involvement in the planning, delivery, or assessment of CBME in an LCME-accredited medical school and were published in English. Outcomes included characteristics of the inventions (duration, librarian role, content covered) and of the outcomes and measures (level on Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, direction of findings, measure used). Results: Fifty studies were included of 11,051 screened: 46 empirical studies or program evaluations and four literature reviews. Studies were published in eight journals with two-thirds published after 2010. Duration of the intervention ranged from 30 minutes to a semester long. Librarians served as collaborators, leaders, curriculum designers, and evaluators. Studies primarily covered asking clinical questions and finding information and most often assessed reaction or learning outcomes. Conclusions: A solid base of literature on librarian involvement in CBME exists; however, few studies measure user behavior or use validated outcomes measures. When librarians are communicating their value to stakeholders, having evidence for the contributions of librarians is essential. Existing publications may not capture the extent of work done in this area. Additional research is needed to quantify the impact of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationEducation, MedicalLibrariansProfessional RoleHumanscase-based learningCBMECompetency-Based EducationcurriculumEBMeducationentrustable professional activitiesEvidence-Based MedicineInstructionlearninglibrarianslibrarieslifelong learningProblem-based learningself-regulated learningtrainingundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39975500
PMCPMC11835034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.