ArticleSSM - population health2024
Patterns in health care use and intensity for diagnosed and undiagnosed cognitive impairment in the older australian community: Implications for primary care management.
Article in SSM - population health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: While the economic burden imposed by dementia is well-documented, findings are mixed on health care use for those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Our objective was to analyse annual, non-hospital medical and pharmaceutical use patterns for older people with undiagnosed MCI and diagnosed dementia, living in the Australian community. Methods: We analysed panel data from a community sample, the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (Australia), linked to administrative data on health care use, using two-part models to estimate the probability of using health care and the annual costs incurred by study participants. Results: People with MCI, unaware of their diagnoses, were significantly less likely to incur annual pathology and diagnostic imaging costs relative to cognitively normal individuals. This effect was concentrated in individuals with MCI who had non-amnestic symptoms, lived alone, or had limited carer support. Compared to cognitively normal individuals, people with MCI were predicted to have slightly lower annual costs for broad medical care categories related to the management and diagnosis of cognitive impairment, and people with dementia, substantially higher professional attendances, and pharmaceutical costs. These findings were consistent across estimation models adjusting for attrition over the study. Policy implications: Diagnosis and symptom management in primary care may enable individuals with MCI to improve their quality of life and prevent more costly future health care use. However, our study found potential gaps in medical service use for people with undiagnosed MCI in the community, especially when they had less support or did not have memory symptoms. Primary care services may need to better diagnose and target these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.