ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Meaningful to whom? Minimal clinically important differences and the priorities of individuals living with dementia for everyday function.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making outcome measures matter: Why should "what matters to people living with dementia" matter to dementia researchers?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Functional cognitive performance augments cognitive screening data in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Meaningful to whom? Minimal clinically important differences and the priorities of individuals living with dementia for everyday function.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD) have a significant impact on an individual's functional cognitive abilities, highlighting the need to prioritize measures of function in evaluating minimally clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds in AD/ADRD research. Input directly from individuals living with AD/ADRD on measures of function are lacking in MCID discussions, including what it means to live with AD/ADRD and what type and degree of improvements are most meaningful across the disease continuum. Most measures for assessing function in AD/ADRD trials are largely focused on basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADL, IADL), which lack aspects of everyday function that matter most to individuals living with AD/ADRD. Expanding outcome evaluation to other dimensions of everyday function and diversifying measurement approaches is essential for optimizing inclusion of personally meaningful aspects of everyday function prioritized by individuals living with AD/ADRD and improving detection of potentially more sensitive changes in functioning. This perspective outlines four directions to expand and integrate what matters most to individuals living with AD/ADRD into trial outcome evaluation, including (1) consideration of how what matters most to individuals living with AD/ADRD may change across the disease continuum from mild to advanced dementia, (2) identification and evaluation of goals around strengths-based domains such as social participation rather than solely emphasizing deficits and losses, (3) utilization of goal-attainment scaling to more specifically match individually-specific functional goals, and (4) strengthening the inclusion and use of self-report and performance-based measures of function and triangulating these measures with informant-report measures. Highlights: Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD) have a significant impact on an individual' functional cognitive abilities, of which changes in these abilities are measured through detection of minimally clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds to determine the effectiveness of AD/ADRD clinical trials.Widely used measures for assessing MCID thresholds in AD/ADRD trials focus on basic and instrumental activities of daily living, presenting opportunities to expand measurement of MCID to account for other dimensions of everyday function that are prioritized by individuals living with AD/ADRD.To expand outcome evaluation and improve integration of aspects of functioning that matter most to people living with AD/ADRD, we identify opportunities to incorporate more diverse strategies via goal-attainment scaling, self-report, and performance-based measures as appropriate. We also highlight the importance of incorporating strengths-based domains such as social participation, moving beyond deficit-focused assessment of functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.