Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975460›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Corrigendum to "Taurine alleviated hepatic steatosis in oleic acid-treated-HepG2 cells and rats fed a high-fat diet"[Heliyon Volume 9, Issue 6, June 2023, Article e16401].

Qi Song, Jun Xia Guo, Yu Xun Ma, Tong Ou, Jing Zhang, Hui Zi Li, Sheng Quan Mi, Yan Zhen Zhang, Hiroaki Oda, Wen Chen

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global research status and trends in venous thromboembolism and pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qi SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jun Xia GuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yu Xun MaBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Tong OuBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jing ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hui Zi LiDepartment of Nutrition, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, 100088, China.
Sheng Quan MiBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yan Zhen ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hiroaki OdaLaboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.
Wen ChenBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16401.].

Identifiers

PMID39975460
PMCPMC11838074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.