Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975452›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Comorbid anxiety predicts lower odds of MDD improvement in a trial of smartphone-delivered interventions.

Morgan B Talbot, Jessica M Lipschitz, Omar Costilla-Reyes

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morgan B TalbotMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Jessica M LipschitzHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Omar Costilla-ReyesMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM144273 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI David Shumway Jones, Jacqueline A. Lees · 2022 to 2026
$14.7M
Toward optimizing digital mental health interventions: A clinical trial aimed at understanding what drives patient engagement.K23MH120324 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIPSCHITZ, JESSICA MORROW · 2020 to 2024
$960k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144273NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH120324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comorbid anxiety disorders are common among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but their impact on outcomes of digital and smartphone-delivered interventions is not well understood. This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled effectiveness trial (n=638) that assessed three smartphone-delivered interventions: Project EVO (a cognitive training app), iPST (a problem-solving therapy app), and Health Tips (an active control). We applied classical machine learning models (logistic regression, support vector machines, decision trees, random forests, and k-nearest-neighbors) to identify baseline predictors of MDD improvement at 4 weeks after trial enrollment. Our analysis produced a decision tree model indicating that a baseline GAD-7 questionnaire score of 11 or higher, a threshold consistent with at least moderate anxiety, strongly predicts lower odds of MDD improvement in this trial. Our exploratory findings suggest that depressed individuals with comorbid anxiety have reduced odds of substantial improvement in the context of smartphone-delivered interventions, as the association was observed across all three intervention groups. Our work highlights a methodology that can identify interpretable clinical thresholds, which, if validated, could predict symptom trajectories and inform treatment selection and intensity.

Indexed as

anxiety disorderscomorbiditymachine learningmajor depressive disorderMental healthmood disorders

Identifiers

PMID39975452
PMCPMC11838690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.