ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Gene regulatory logic of the interferon-β enhancer contains multiple selectively deployed modes of transcription factor synergy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type I interferon IFNβ is a key regulator of the immune response, and its dysregulated expression causes disease. The regulation of IFNβ promoter activity has been a touchpoint of mammalian gene control research since the discovery of functional synergy between two stimulus-responsive transcription factors (TFs) nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and interferon regulatory factors (IRF). However, subsequent gene knockout studies revealed that this synergy is condition-dependent such that either NFκB or IRF activation can be dispensable, leaving the precise regulatory logic of IFNβ transcription an open question. Here, we developed a series of quantitative enhancer states models of IFNβ expression control and evaluated them with stimulus-response data from TF knockouts. Our analysis confirmed that TF synergy is a hallmark of the regulatory logic but that it need not involve NFκB, as synergy between two adjacent IRF dimers is sufficient. We found that a sigmoidal binding curve at the distal site renders the dual IRF synergy mode ultrasensitive, allowing it only in conditions of high IRF activity upon viral infection. In contrast, the proximal site has high affinity and enables expression in response to bacterial exposure through synergy with NFκB. However, its accessibility is controlled by the competitive repressor p50:p50, which prevents basal IRF levels from synergizing with NFκB, such that NFκB-only stimuli do not activate IFNβ expression. The enhancer states model identifies multiple synergy modes that are accessed differentially in response to different immune threats, enabling a highly stimulus-specific but also versatile regulatory logic for stimulus-specific IFNβ expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.