ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Principled PCA separates signal from noise in omics count data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) is indispensable for processing high-throughput omics datasets, as it can extract meaningful biological variability while minimizing the influence of noise. However, the suitability of PCA is contingent on appropriate normalization and transformation of count data, and accurate selection of the number of principal components; improper choices can result in the loss of biological information or corruption of the signal due to excessive noise. Typical approaches to these challenges rely on heuristics that lack theoretical foundations. In this work, we present Biwhitened PCA (BiPCA), a theoretically grounded framework for rank estimation and data denoising across a wide range of omics modalities. BiPCA overcomes a fundamental difficulty with handling count noise in omics data by adaptively rescaling the rows and columns - a rigorous procedure that standardizes the noise variances across both dimensions. Through simulations and analysis of over 100 datasets spanning seven omics modalities, we demonstrate that BiPCA reliably recovers the data rank and enhances the biological interpretability of count data. In particular, BiPCA enhances marker gene expression, preserves cell neighborhoods, and mitigates batch effects. Our results establish BiPCA as a robust and versatile framework for high-throughput count data analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.