Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975240›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Computation-through-Dynamics Benchmark: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity.

Christopher Versteeg, Jonathan D McCart, Mitchell Ostrow, David M Zoltowski, Clayton B Washington, Laura Driscoll, Olivier Codol, Jonathan A Michaels, Scott W Linderman, David Sussillo and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christopher VersteegWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-5109
Jonathan D McCartWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-234X
Mitchell OstrowDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9732-548X
David M ZoltowskiWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0407-7841
Clayton B WashingtonWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1587-3196
Laura DriscollAllen Institute for Neural Dynamics, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5247-1857
Olivier CodolDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0796-5457
Jonathan A MichaelsSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-3181
Scott W LindermanWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-9073
David SussilloWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-1264
Chethan PandarinathWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-1432

Funding

Fusing motor neuroscience and artificial intelligence to create next-generation neural prostheses.DP2NS127291 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PANDARINATH, CHETHAN · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Robust modeling of within- and across-area population dynamics using recurrent neural networks - Admin SupplRF1DA055667 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, LEE, PANDARINATH, CHETHAN · 2021 to 2023
$1.6M
Developing novel neural network tools for accurate and interpretable dynamical modeling of neural circuitsF32MH132175 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VERSTEEG, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2025
$245k
NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055667NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH132175NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS127291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary goal of systems neuroscience is to discover how ensembles of neurons transform inputs into goal-directed behavior, a process known as neural computation. A powerful framework for understanding neural computation uses neural dynamics - the rules that describe the temporal evolution of neural activity - to explain how goal-directed input-output transformations occur. As dynamical rules are not directly observable, we need computational models that can infer neural dynamics from recorded neural activity. We typically validate such models using synthetic datasets with known ground-truth dynamics, but unfortunately existing synthetic datasets don't reflect fundamental features of neural computation and are thus poor proxies for neural systems. Further, the field lacks validated metrics for quantifying the accuracy of the dynamics inferred by models. The Computation-through-Dynamics Benchmark (CtDB) fills these critical gaps by providing: 1) synthetic datasets that reflect computational properties of biological neural circuits, 2) interpretable metrics for quantifying model performance, and 3) a standardized pipeline for training and evaluating models with or without known external inputs. In this manuscript, we demonstrate how CtDB can help guide the development, tuning, and troubleshooting of neural dynamics models. In summary, CtDB provides a critical platform for model developers to better understand and characterize neural computation through the lens of dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID39975240
PMCPMC11839132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.