ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unraveling latent cognitive, metacognitive, strategic, and affective processes underlying children's problem-solving using Bayesian cognitive modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children exhibit remarkable variability in their mathematical problem-solving abilities, yet the cognitive, metacognitive and affective mechanisms underlying these individual differences remain poorly understood. We developed a novel Bayesian model of arithmetic problem-solving (BMAPS) to uncover the latent processes governing children's arithmetic strategy choice and efficiency. BMAPS inferred cognitive parameters related to strategy execution and metacognitive parameters related to strategy selection, revealing key mechanisms of adaptive problem solving. BMAPS parameters collectively explained individual differences in problem-solving performance, predicted longitudinal gains in arithmetic fluency and mathematical reasoning, and mediated the effects of anxiety and attitudes on performance. Clustering analyses using BMAPS parameters revealed distinct profiles of strategy use, metacognitive efficiency, and developmental change. By quantifying the fine-grained dynamics of strategy selection and execution and their relation to affective factors and academic outcomes, BMAPS provides new insights into the cognitive and metacognitive underpinnings of children's mathematical learning. This work advances powerful computational methods for uncovering latent mechanisms of complex cognition in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.