ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Extracting Knowledge from Scientific Texts on Patient-Derived Cancer Models Using Large Language Models: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-derived cancer models (PDCMs) have emerged as indispensable tools in both cancer research and preclinical studies. The number of publications on PDCMs increased significantly in the last decade. Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), hold promise for extracting knowledge from scientific texts at scale. This study investigates the use of LLM-based systems for automatically extracting PDCM-related entities from scientific texts. We evaluated two approaches: direct prompting and soft prompting using LLMs. For direct prompting, we manually create prompts to guide the LLMs to output PDCM-related entities from texts. The prompt consists of an instruction, definitions of entity types, gold examples and a query. We automatically train soft prompts - a novel line of research in this domain - as continuous vectors using machine learning approaches. Our experiments utilized state-of-the-art LLMs - proprietary GPT4-o and a series of open LLaMA3 family models. In our experiments, GPT4-o with direct prompts maintained competitive results. Our results demonstrate that soft prompting can effectively enhance the capabilities of smaller open LLMs, achieving results comparable to proprietary models. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs in domain-specific text extraction tasks and emphasize the importance of tailoring approaches to the task and model characteristics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.