Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975087›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Multivariate Neural Markers of Individual Differences in Thought Control Difficulties.

Jacob DeRosa, Harry R Smolker, Hyojeong Kim, Boman Groff, Jarrod Lewis-Peacock, Marie T Banich

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob DeRosaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.
Harry R SmolkerInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder.
Hyojeong KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Boman GroffDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.
Jarrod Lewis-PeacockDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Marie T BanichDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.

Funding

Neural and Cognitive Mechanisms for Removing Emotional Information from Working MemoryR01MH129042 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
Removing and Manipulating Emotional Information in Working Memory: Cognitive and Neural RepresentationsR56MH125642 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2021 to 2021
$770k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129042NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH125642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difficulties in controlling thought, including pathological rumination, worry, and intrusive thoughts, occur in a range of mental health disorders. Here we identify specific patterns of brain activity distributed within and across canonical brain networks that are associated with self-reported difficulties in controlling one's thoughts. These activity patterns were derived using multivariate pattern analysis on fMRI data recorded while participants engaged in one of four operations on an item in working memory: maintaining it, replacing it with another, specifically suppressing it, or clearing the mind of all thought. Individuals who reported greater difficulties exhibited brain activation patterns that were more variable and less differentiated across the four operations in frontoparietal and default mode networks, and showed less distinct patterns of connectivity within the default mode network. These activity profiles were absent during rest but serve as promising task-based neural markers, explaining over 30% of the variance in thought control difficulties.

Indexed as

Cognitive ControlCortical GradientsDefault Mode NetworkFrontoparietal NetworkFunctional ConnectivityIndividual DifferencesMulti-voxel Pattern AnalysisRepresentational Similarity AnalysisWorking Memory

Identifiers

PMID39975087
PMCPMC11838559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.