ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Estimating Protein Complex Model Accuracy Using Graph Transformers and Pairwise Similarity Graphs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Estimation of protein complex structure accuracy is an essential step in protein complex structure prediction and is also important for users to select good structural models for various applications, such as protein function analysis and drug design. Despite the success of structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3, predicting the quality of predicted complex structures (structural models) and selecting top ones from large model pools remains challenging. Results: We present GATE, a novel method that uses graph transformers on pairwise model similarity graphs to predict the quality (accuracy) of complex structural models. By integrating single-model and multi-model quality features, GATE captures both the characteristics of individual models and the geometric similarity between them to make robust predictions. On the dataset of the 15th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15), GATE achieved the highest Pearson's correlation (0.748) and the lowest ranking loss (0.1191) compared to existing methods. In the blind CASP16 experiment, GATE was ranked 4th according to the overall sum of z-scores of multiple metrics based on both TM-score and Oligo-GDTTS scores. In terms of per-target average metrics based on TM-score, GATE achieved a Pearson's correlation of 0.7076 (1st place among all methods), a Spearman's correlation of 0.4514 (3rd place), a ranking loss of 0.1221 (3rd place), and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) score of 0.6680 (3rd place), highlighting its strong, balanced ability of estimating complex model accuracy and selecting good models. Availability: The source code of GATE is freely available at https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/GATE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.