ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Haplotype Matching with GBWT for Pangenome Graphs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, variations from a linear reference genome were used to represent large sets of haplotypes compactly. In the linear reference genome based paradigm, the positional Burrows-Wheeler transform (PBWT) has traditionally been used to perform efficient haplotype matching. Pangenome graphs have recently been proposed as an alternative to linear reference genomes for representing the full spectrum of variations in the human genome. However, haplotype matches in pangenome graph based haplotype sets are not trivially generalizable from haplotype matches in the linear reference genome based haplotype sets. Work has been done to represent large sets of haplotypes as paths through a pangenome graph. The graph Burrows-Wheeler transform (GBWT) is one such work. The GBWT essentially stores the haplotype paths in a run length compressed BWT with compressed local alphabets. Although efficient in practice count and locate queries on the GBWT were provided by the original authors, the efficient haplotype matching capabilities of the PBWT have never been shown on the GBWT. In this paper, we formally define the notion of haplotype matches in pangenome graph-based haplotype sets by generalizing from haplotype matches in linear reference genome-based haplotype sets. We also describe the relationship between set maximal matches, long matches, locally maximal matches, and text maximal matches on the GBWT, PBWT, and the BWT. We provide algorithms for outputting some of these matches by applying the data structures of the r-index (introduced by Gagie et al.) to the GBWT. We show that these structures enable set maximal match and long match queries on the GBWT in almost linear time and in space close to linear in the number of runs in the GBWT. We also provide multiple versions of the query algorithms for different combinations of the available data structures. The long match query algorithms presented here even run on the BWT in the same time complexity as the GBWT due to their similarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.