ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Genes and Pathways Comprising the Human and Mouse ORFeomes Display Distinct Codon Bias Signatures that Can Regulate Protein Levels.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arginine, glutamic acid and selenocysteine based codon bias has been shown to regulate the translation of specific mRNAs for proteins that participate in stress responses, cell cycle and transcriptional regulation. Defining codon-bias in gene networks has the potential to identify other pathways under translational control. Here we have used computational methods to analyze the ORFeome of all unique human (19,711) and mouse (22,138) open-reading frames (ORFs) to characterize codon-usage and codon-bias in genes and biological processes. We show that ORFeome-wide clustering of gene-specific codon frequency data can be used to identify ontology-enriched biological processes and gene networks, with developmental and immunological programs well represented for both humans and mice. We developed codon over-use ontology mapping and hierarchical clustering to identify multi-codon bias signatures in human and mouse genes linked to signaling, development, mitochondria and metabolism, among others. The most distinct multi-codon bias signatures were identified in human genes linked to skin development and RNA metabolism, and in mouse genes linked to olfactory transduction and ribosome, highlighting species-specific pathways potentially regulated by translation. Extreme codon bias was identified in genes that included transcription factors and histone variants. We show that re-engineering extreme usage of C- or U-ending codons for aspartic acid, asparagine, histidine and tyrosine in the transcription factors
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.