ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
User-Assisted Approach for Accurate Nonrigid Registration of Images and Traces.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fully automated registration algorithms are prone to getting trapped in solutions corresponding to local minima of their objective functions, leading to errors that are easy to detect but challenging to correct. Traditional solutions often involve iterative parameter tuning, data preprocessing and preregistering, and multiple algorithm reruns-an approach that is both time-consuming and does not guarantee satisfactory results. Therefore, for tasks where registration accuracy is more important than speed, it is appropriate to explore alternative, user-assisted registration strategies. In such tasks, finding and correcting errors in automated registration is often more time-consuming than directly integrating user input during the registration process. Therefore, this study evaluates a user-assisted approach for accurate nonrigid registration of images and traces. By leveraging the corresponding sets of fiducial points provided by the user to guide the registration, the algorithm computes an optimal nonrigid transformation that combines linear and nonlinear components. Our findings demonstrate that the registration accuracy of this approach improves consistently with the increased complexity of the linear transformation and as more fiducial points are provided. As a result, accuracy sufficient for many biomedical applications can be achieved within minutes, requiring only a small number of user-provided fiducial points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.