ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Differentiating unirradiated mice from those exposed to conventional or FLASH radiotherapy using MRI.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: The FLASH effect expands the therapeutic ratio of tumor control to normal tissue toxicity observed after delivery of ultra-high (>100 Gy/s FLASH-RT) vs. conventional dose rate radiation (CONV-RT). In this first exploratory study, we assessed whether ex-vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could reveal long-term differences after FLASH-RT and CONV-RT whole-brain irradiation. Materials and methods: Female C57BL/6 mice were divided into three groups: control (non-irradiated), conventional (CONV-RT 0.1 Gy/s), and ultra-high dose rates (FLASH-RT 1 pulse, 5.5 × 10^6 Gy/s), and received 10 Gy of whole-brain irradiation in a single fraction at 10 weeks of age. Mice were evaluated by Novel Object Recognition cognitive testing at 10 months post-irradiation and were sampled at 13 months post-irradiation. Ex-vivo brains were imaged with a 14.1 Tesla/26 cm magnet with a multimodal MRI protocol, including T2-weighted TurboRare (T2W) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Results: In accordance with previous results, cognitive tests indicated that animals receiving CONV-RT exhibited a decline in cognitive function, while FLASH-RT performed similarly to the controls. MRI showed decreased hippocampal mean intensity in the CONV-RT mice compared to controls but not in the FLASH-RT group. Comparing CONV-RT to control, we found significant changes in multiple whole-brain diffusion metrics, including the mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) metrics. By contrast, no significant diffusion changes were found between the FLASH-RT and control groups. In an exploratory analysis compared to controls, regional diffusion metrics were primarily altered in the basal forebrain and the insular cortex after CONV-RT, and after FLASH-RT, a trend reduction was also observed. Conclusion: This study presents initial evidence that MRI can uncover clear changes in the brain after CONV-RT but not after FLASH-RT. The MRI results aligned with the observed cognitive protection after FLASH-RT, indicating the potential use of MRI to analyze the FLASH response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.