Formulation and characterization of nanoemulsion containing anthocyanin extract from purple yam (

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ultrasound-enhanced deep eutectic solvent extraction and encapsulation of eggplant peel polyphenols for low-fat mozzarella spread formulation.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026
   Article
2. A novel formulation of multi-vitamin fortified beverage with natural antioxidant by nano-hybrid encapsulation for hydration and immune support.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
   Article
3. Design, Optimization, Manufacture and Characterization of Milbemycin Oxime Nanoemulsions.Pharmaceutics · 2025
   Article
4. Selection strategy for encapsulation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic ingredients with food-grade materials: A systematic review and analysis.Food chemistry: X · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as