Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974827›Full record

ArticleJournal of caring sciences2024

Intention to Leave the Profession in Nursing: A Hybrid Concept Analysis.

Sahar Dabaghi, Zohreh Nabizadeh-Gharghozar, Armin Amanibani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sahar DabaghiDepartment of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-1593
Zohreh Nabizadeh-GharghozarDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-7632
Armin AmanibaniStudent of Osteopathy (D.O) in Osteopathic College of Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-5555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Leaving the profession is a major challenge in all organizations throughout the world. Intention to leave the profession (ILP) is what individuals perceive about leaving the profession. Nurses' perceptions of ILP are context-based and hence, studies in different contexts are needed to further explore ILP. The aim of this study was to analyze the concept of ILP, determine its attributes, antecedents, consequences, and provide a clear definition for it. Methods: This concept analysis was done using the hybrid model. In the theoretical phase, Magiran, Iran Medex, SID, Science Direct, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched to retrieve ILP-related studies published in 2000-2023. In the fieldwork phase, semi-structured interviews were held with twenty nurses and nursing managers and the data were analyzed through conventional content analysis. In the final analysis phase, the results of the two former phases were compared and integrated. Results: ILP can be defined as "a voluntary and gradual process occurred due to professional disinterest, negative professional attitude, and unmanaged organizational stress and is associated with reduced job motivation, fatigue, and thoughts about leaving the profession which eventually leads to decision about staying in or leaving the organization". Conclusion: ILP is affected by many different personal, interpersonal, occupational, professional, organizational, environmental, and social antecedents and is associated with different patient, nurse, care-related, and organizational consequences. Nursing authorities and managers need to employ strategies to manage ILP antecedents and thereby, reduce nurses' ILP.

Indexed as

Concept analysisIntentionNursing

Identifiers

PMID39974827
PMCPMC11833438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.