Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974812›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025

The dartocavernous stitch surgical technique for prevention of recurrent phimosis in obese patients presenting for circumcision.

Rebecca Anderson, Gabriel Fernandez-Pedrosa, Amjad Alwaal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca AndersonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-871X
Gabriel Fernandez-PedrosaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Amjad AlwaalDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of circumcision, several complications can arise, including cosmetic ones. Obesity is a risk factor that can lead to postoperative buried penis after circumcision due to cicatricial scarring. While there are conservative techniques requiring patient commitment to penile manipulation postoperatively to diminish the risk, it remains an ineffective maneuver. Often, surgeons may remove more penile skin than necessary to prevent this complication, or even avoid offering the procedure in these patients. We propose a new technique that prevents buried penis and recurrent phimosis after circumcision in obese patients. There were 4 obese patients, aged 27-63 years old from a single surgeon that underwent circumcision with placement of dartocavernous stitch using 2-0 polydioxanone (PDS). The technique involves placing 2 sutures at 3 and 9 o'clock attaching the proximal and distal Dartos layers to the tunica albuginea. The average body mass index (BMI) was 41.45 kg/m

Indexed as

buried penisMale circumcisionobesityphimosis

Identifiers

PMID39974812
PMCPMC11833539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.