ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Increased efficacy in lower pole stone management with a novel flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheath-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 1-3 cm simple lower calyceal calculi: a prospective randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Clinical Analysis of 17 Cases of Eosinophilic Cystitis in Children and Literature Review.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparison of the effects of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteral impacted stones with infection.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) is regarded as a complement to flexible ureteroscopy in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Management of lower pole stones (LPS) is challenging due to the difficulty of anatomical access to the inferior renal calyx. Case Description: The novel FANS-UAS (11/13.5 Fr; 40/50 cm length; 7 cm navigable tip length; 180° angulation) from Well Lead Medical (Guangzhou, China) has been commercially-available in July 2024 and first-used in The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital. This case series included five candidates (three males; mean age 37.8±15.1 years) with LPS (max. diameter 7-10.5 mm) undergoing FANS-UAS with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Success rate of FANS-UAS catheterization was 80% as a male patient displayed poor ureter elasticity intraoperatively and the operation had to be completed with a 10/12 Fr tip-flexible UAS and stone basket. LPS, including those with an infundibulopelvic angle <30°, could be easily navigated and removed with insignificant to no residual stones remaining. No stone basket was used. Grade I and II ureteric injuries occurred in two separate patients that were resolved upon four weeks of ureteral stenting. No significant intra- and post-operative complication was observed. The mean total operative duration was 66.5±22.6 minutes. Computed tomography scans were conducted at day one post-operation. Among the cases with successful FANS-UAS insertion, the absolute and relative stone free rate, defined as complete absence and absence of residual fragments <2 mm, was 75% and 100%, respectively. All patients remained stone-free at one-month follow-up with no adverse events. Conclusions: Early outcomes of the novel 11/13.5 Fr FANS-UAS applied successfully on four patients demonstrate its feasibility, safety, and efficiency in removing LPS. However, improvements in design may be necessitated in the future. For the meantime, prolonged follow-up and larger patient samples are necessitated to further elucidate its outcomes and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.