Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974785›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2025

Effect of breed composition in genomic prediction using crossbred pig reference population.

Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Euiseo HongDepartment of Bio-Big Data and Precision Agriculture, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3078-2560
Yoonji ChungInstitute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-6468
Phuong Thanh N DinhDepartment of Bio-AI Convergence, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3057-0210
Yoonsik KimInstitute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5318-7521
Suyeon MaengDivision of Animal & Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-3803
Young Jae ChoiDepartment of Bio-AI Convergence, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-6970
Jaeho LeeDepartment of Bio-AI Convergence, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7721-8135
Woonyoung JeongDepartment of Bio-Big Data and Precision Agriculture, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7572-1382
Hyunji ChoiDivision of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-6586
Seung Hwan LeeDivision of Animal & Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-4887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.

Indexed as

Genomic breed compositionGenomic predictionMulti-breed genomic predictionPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID39974785
PMCPMC11833194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.