ArticleHRB open research2024
Guideline recommendations on the role of the general practitioner in the diagnosis of dementia: a protocol for a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.
Article in HRB open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.Family practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A timely diagnosis of dementia offers the opportunity of earlier intervention and activation of coordinated care plans. General Practitioners (GPs) play a key role in dementia diagnosis, from symptom recognition to clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral for confirmation of the diagnosis and subtyping. Dementia clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer clinicians guidance on dementia care but often do not specifically address the role of the GP in the diagnostic process. This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify evidence-based dementia clinical practice guidelines and map the recommended role of GPs in the diagnosis of dementia. Method: The scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to guide the reporting. We will search five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library) for dementia CPGs published since 2019. CPGs are often not published in peer-reviewed journals; therefore, a parallel search of relevant grey literature will be conducted. We will also search the websites of GP professional organisations and guideline developers. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles based on inclusion criteria, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Conclusion: This scoping review will examine up-to-date dementia CPGs to determine recommendations for the role of GPs in the assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral of patients with suspected dementia to secondary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.