Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974699›Full record

ReviewChem & bio engineering2024

Recent Advances in Metal-Free Peptide Stapling Strategies.

Wanglin Zhan, Hongliang Duan, Chengxi Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chem & bio engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Late-Stage Functionalization of Peptides on the Solid Phase.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhancement of Structural Stability and IgG Affinity of aAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Diverse thioether macrocyclized peptides through a radical SAM maturase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wanglin ZhanCollege of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China.
Hongliang DuanFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-0115
Chengxi LiCollege of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-0299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) pose challenges for intervention through small molecule drugs, protein drugs, and linear peptides due to inherent limitations such as inappropriate size, poor stability, and limited membrane penetrance. The emergence of stapled α-helical peptides presents a promising avenue as potential competitors for inhibiting PPIs, demonstrating enhanced structural stability and increased tolerance to proteolytic enzymes. This review aims to provide an overview of metal-free stapling strategies involving two identical natural amino acids, two different natural amino acids, non-natural amino acids, and multicomponent reactions. The primary objective is to delineate comprehensive peptide stapling approaches and foster innovative ideation among readers by accentuating methodologies published within the past five years and elucidating evolving trends in stapled peptides.

Identifiers

PMID39974699
PMCPMC11835171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.