ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Performance Comparison of Liquid Chromatography and Paper Spray Ionization with Mass Spectrometry for Measuring Kinase Inhibitors in Human Plasma.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paper spray mass spectrometry for rapid toxicology targeted screening of emergency department samples: a research study.Journal of analytical toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kinase inhibitors are small-molecule drugs designed to target oncogenic mutations in cancer treatment. Although less toxic than conventional chemotherapy drugs, they can cause severe adverse effects in some patients, resulting in dose reduction and cessation. To evaluate if therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors and their metabolites can improve toxicity assessment in patients, we developed and evaluated the analytical performance of two parallel methods utilizing liquid chromatography (LC) and paper spray (PS) ionization coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) for the measurement of dabrafenib, its major metabolite OH-dabrafenib, and trametinib in patient plasma samples. The PS-MS method yielded a faster sample analysis time (2 min) compared to the LC separation (9 min). The two methods shared the same analytical measurement range (AMR) for dabrafenib and OH-dabrafenib (10-3500 and 10-1250 ng/mL), but the AMR differed for trametinib (LC-MS: 0.5-50 ng/mL; PS-MS: 5.0-50 ng/mL). The imprecision across their respective AMR was 1.3-6.5% (dabrafenib), 3.0-9.7% (OH-dabrafenib), and 1.3-5.1% (trametinib) for the LC-MS method and 3.8-6.7% (dabrafenib), 4.0-8.9% (OH-dabrafenib), and 3.2-9.9% (trametinib) for the PS-MS method. Using authentic patient samples, the quantification results were comparable between the two methods: dabrafenib (correlation coefficient
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.