ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Regional variation in temperature control after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We evaluated hospitals for variation in temperature control (TC) use after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a regional emergency medical services system and assessed association of hospital-level TC utilization with survival. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adults with non-traumatic OHCA who survived to hospital admission from 2016 to 2018 in King County, Washington. Hospitals with < 80 OHCA cases were excluded. Primary exposure was hospital-level proportion of TC. Measured outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and neurologically favorable survival (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2). Logistic regression modeling clustered patients by treating hospital and evaluated associations between TC and outcomes with covariate adjustment. Results: Of 1,035 eligible patients admitted to eight hospitals, 69% were male, 38% had an initial shockable rhythm, and 61% had presumed cardiac etiology for OHCA. TC was initiated in 787 patients (74%) and ranged from 57 to 87% across hospitals. Overall, 34% of patients survived neurologically intact, 74% of whom received TC. In the adjusted model, public OHCA location (OR: 1.7 [95% CI 1.3-2.3]), witnessed arrest (OR: 1.6 [1.2-2.2]), and shockable rhythm (OR: 5.5 [3.9-7.8]) were more strongly associated with survival than TC utilization (OR: 0.6 [0.4-0.8]). Similar results were seen for neurologically favorable survival and did not vary significantly by hospital. Conclusions: Hospital-level TC utilization was not associated with improved survival or neurologically favorable survival after OHCA. Future studies should examine which aspects of the post-cardiac arrest care bundle most strongly influence outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.