ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2025
Discriminating the adulteration of varieties and misrepresentation of vintages of Pu'er tea based on Fourier transform near infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the Pu'er tea market, the ubiquity of blending different varieties and the fraudulent representation of vintage years present a persistent challenge. Traditional sensory evaluation and experience are often inadequate for discerning the true variety and vintage of tea, highlighting the need for more sophisticated analytical methods to ensure authenticity and quality. Fourier transform near infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy combined with radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) was applied for determination of the varieties and vintages of Pu'er tea. For vintage identification, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the RBFNN model for the prediction set were 99.2%, 98.2%, 98.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. For identification of varieties adulteration, the corresponding parameters were 98.9%, 97.2%, 96.7%, and 96.6%, respectively. These results illustrated the feasibility to identify the adulteration of varieties and misrepresentation of vintages of Pu'er tea with near infrared spectra and RBFNN model, proving an efficient alternative for Pu'er tea quality inspection, and offering a robust method for combating the pervasive issues within the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.