Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974573›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Paediatric urodynamic studies: emerging technologies and new frontiers.

Tayla Fay, Aniruddh V Deshpande, Thomas Blanc, Chris Kimber, Kiarash Taghavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tayla FayDepartment of Urology, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-5582
Aniruddh V DeshpandeDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Thomas BlancDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Chris KimberDepartment of Paediatric Urology, Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kiarash TaghaviDepartment of Paediatric Urology, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-9966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there have been significant developments in paediatric urodynamic studies focusing on less-invasive monitoring devices, as well as re-defining normative values. This article reviews current paediatric urodynamic study methods and their reliability, and discusses new emerging ambulatory urodynamics and novel telemetric urodynamic devices. Traditional urodynamic studies are performed in specialised suites in real-time with artificial bladder filling. Ambulatory models allow for measurements in a more authentic environment and with natural bladder filling. Novel implanted telemetric monitoring devices provide a catheter-free solution but are inherently invasive in nature. Exploration of indirect measurements to obtain urodynamic data warrant further investigation. Definitive progress will require strong and sustained collaboration between end users and developers.

Indexed as

ambulatory urodynamic monitoringbladder pressuretelemetricwireless sensor

Identifiers

PMID39974573
PMCPMC11837077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.