Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974564›Full record

ReviewACS ES&T water2025

Water Disinfection Systems for Pools and Spas: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Consumer Views in the US.

Mourin Jarin, Jackie Ly, Jonathan Goldman, Xing Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS ES&T water, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mourin JarinSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1514-4990
Jackie LySchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Jonathan GoldmanOffice of Commercialization, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Xing XieSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-0964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disinfection of swimming pools and hot tubs (pools/spas) are necessary to prevent outbreaks and exposure to waterborne pathogens from water recreation. However, harmful disinfection byproducts (DBPs) from heavy chlorine usage continue to be a growing concern. Chlorine-based disinfectants also react with human inputs like sweat, urine, cosmetics, sunscreen, etc., that are introduced in a pool/spa, further increasing the severity of the DBP problem. We reviewed the current status of water disinfection technologies in the pool/spa industry and summarize the methods, trends, advantages, and disadvantages from a health and consumer viewpoint. Market research and face-to-face interviews were also accomplished with 100 industry experts and end-users in the US. We then integrate the literature findings in parallel with these market insights. Overall, we conclude the future of water recreation is trending away from high dosage chlorine-based solutions to disinfect swimming water and turning to alternatives with better sustainability and safety in mind. Lastly, we discuss the future directions of these technologies with current and past trends, offering insights to where research and development should be focused for both the user's health and overall experience.

Identifiers

PMID39974564
PMCPMC11833866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.