ReviewMedical review (2021)2025
Biophysical stimuli for promoting bone repair and regeneration.
Review in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxygen-vacancy-engineered t-ZnO-CeOBioactive materials · 2026Article
- A near-infrared regulated programmable multi-mode periosteum scaffold for sequential healing of infected bone defects.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical Determinants and Bone Metabolic Correlates of 24-h Urinary PGE2 and PGEM Excretion in Chinese Adults: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026Review
- Ultrasound medicine in the era of precision theranostics: Mechanisms, molecular strategies, and clinical translation.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Adjunctive Biophysical Stimulation for Bone Regeneration Across Distraction Osteogenesis, Limb Reconstruction, and Delayed Union.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Single-layer graphene oxide nanosheets induce proliferation and Osteogenesis of single-cell hBMSCs encapsulated in Alginate Microgels.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone injuries and diseases are associated with profound changes in the biophysical properties of living bone tissues, particularly their electrical and mechanical properties. The biophysical properties of healthy bone are attributed to the complex network of interactions between its various cell types (i.e., osteocytes, osteoclast, immune cells and vascular endothelial cells) with the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) against the backdrop of a myriad of biomechanical and bioelectrical stimuli arising from daily physical activities. Understanding the pathophysiological changes in bone biophysical properties is critical to developing new therapeutic strategies and novel scaffold biomaterials for orthopedic surgery and tissue engineering, as well as provides a basis for the application of various biophysical stimuli as therapeutic agents to restore the physiological microenvironment of injured/diseased bone tissue, to facilitate its repair and regeneration. These include mechanical, electrical, magnetic, thermal and ultrasound stimuli, which will be critically examined in this review. A significant advantage of utilizing such biophysical stimuli to facilitate bone healing is that these may be applied non-invasively with minimal damage to surrounding tissues, unlike conventional orthopedic surgical procedures. Furthermore, the effects of such biophysical stimuli can be localized specifically at the bone defect site, unlike drugs or growth factors that tend to diffuse away after delivery, which may result in detrimental side effects at ectopic sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.